Battlefield
Earth (PG-13)
OK,
Ill admit that I didnt walk into the theater with an open
mind about "Battlefield Earth." Id heard some of the bad
reviews of this post-apocalyptic sci-fi flick starring John Travolta.
The movie is based on a book by L. Ron Hubbard, the late founder of Scientology.
Scientology is a pseudo-religious cult favored by many Hollywood actors,
including Travolta.
Usually, when Im
so prepared not to like a film, I end up enjoying it a lot more than I
expected.
Not this time.
First of all, let
me say that I didnt see any subtle pro-Scientology messages in the
movie. I didnt see anything subtle at all. If Travolta was hoping
to influence anyone toward his church based on this, hes going to
be as disappointed as his fans were while watching the film. (Travolta
has repeatedly claimed the movie wasn't designed to promote scientology
and it apparently does not).
Set in the year 3,000,
the story opens by telling us that "humans are an endangered species."
Apparently, about 1,000 years before, the Psychlos defeated the humans
and took over the earth in about eight minutes. Since that time theyve
been treating the humans as dumb animals and slaves.
Travolta plays Terl,
the planetary security chief who cant seem to stop throwing his
head back and laughing whenever he breaks an agreement via some twisted
Bart Simpson-style logic. (e.g. "I did say I wouldnt kill your
friend, but I didnt say that guy wouldnt kill your friend.
HA. HA. HA. HA. HA. HA.")
Terl is so confident
that humans pose no threat to him that he hooks one of them (Barry Pepper)
up to a "learning machine" that teaches him the Psychlo language
(and math!). Then, just to prove that humans cant do anything, he
takes this "man-slave" to a thousand-year-old library (with
all the books still intact) so he can see how useless it is to fight the
Psychlos. (I didnt get it, either) There, of course, the man finds
the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, which inspires him
to go find fighter jets that still work after 1,000 years of sitting around
in their hangers.
Not only were the
holes in the plot large enough for Travoltas nine-foot character
to walk through, but the movie-making itself seemed unbound by rational
thought. The whole thing was so dark, I often wasnt sure what I
was looking at. The music was loud and bad. And the camera would often
tilt to one side or the other for no apparent reason at all.
Even the special effects
- which Im sure drove up the cost of the film - were laughable.
Lots of paintings of cityscapes. Lots of obvious Hollywood back lots.
Lots of silly, sub-Star Trek make-up. Its like the movie was trying
to irritate people.
Theres no language
or sex to worry about, just some unbelievable sci-fi violence. But thats
not a good enough reason to go see this movie. Im sure youll
get a chance to see it when it becomes one of those "stupid movie
classics" that people watch late at night when theyre in the
mood to giggle.
Until then, dont
bother (unless you enjoy spending $6.50 to giggle at the theater).